Case Study 6.4
This scenario is an example of competing interests among stakeholders involved in animal research and care. As evident in the case, Dr. Jiao Fang is very correct because there is overwhelming evidence showing that the animals are seemingly in distress and pain. It is highly unethical to put animals in distress, high degree of discomfort, and pain. Dr. James Zogbys dismissive attitude and stance are detrimental to the proper treatment and care of the animals in the case. In this regard, Dr. Zogby is not taking care of animals in the right manner and as stated in Proverbs 12:10. Given the competing interests at hand, Dr. Jiao faces a dilemma on the right approach to address the issue without affecting the mentor-training relationship or jeopardizing her career with Dr. Zogbys lab. Finding a better alternative solution to the issue is critical given that improperly managing competing interests in animal research and care could have inappropriate impacts and results (Macrina, 2005). Therefore, the best alternative solution is for Dr. Jiao to recommend further observations of the animals to Dr. Zogby. She could also recommend the involvement of other stakeholders within or outside the lab in observing and monitoring the animals. Insights obtained from the observations could then be used to make necessary changes that enhance the safety and health of the animals.
Case Study 6.7
As evident in the scenario, Dr. Ellen Schwartz is facing a dilemma that could have significant ramifications for the experiments depending on the decision she makes or the course of action she takes. While Dr. Schwartzs initial plan seems to be the most ethical thing to do in the scenario, it could be deemed questionable in animal research regulations. One of the issues that could likely emerge if she goes ahead with her initial plan is the fact that she is not listed as an investigator on the protocol. On the other hand, if she does nothing about the scenario, she could be found liable for anything that happens...
Therefore, the most suitable course of action for Dr. Schwartz is to create an emergency protocol and document all her observations. When documenting her observations, Dr. Schwarz should gather as much information as possible regarding what happened to the rats. This could...
…regarding the experiment and how each step was carried out will be provided. Reporting the issue to IACUC will be in line with the biblical principle of subjecting oneself to governing authorities as shown in Romans 13:1.
Social Drinking and Drinking Coffee
Drinking coffee and social drinking basically involve the consumption of refreshments for various reasons. Social drinking is different from drinking coffee because social drinking involves alcohol consumption in various social settings. While both of them do not necessarily create personal, mental or physical problems, social drinking can result in alcohol addiction if carried out excessively. However, both social drinking and drinking coffee could make one a slave to the substances if they result in addiction as stated in 2 Peter 2:19.
Using Valium, Tobacco, and Marijuana
Valium, tobacco, and marijuana can be addictive substances if used regularly and for a prolonged period of time. These three elements are stimulants that generate different bodily reactions and responses. The potential addiction to these substances could result in slavery to substances if the individual is overcome by the addiction as stated in 2 Peter 2:19. Valium and marijuana can be used for medical and recreational purposes whereas tobacco is primarily used for…
